A researcher on X named Methuselah posted an article called The four corners of the earth: how the magnetic quadrupole dictates allowable ECDO pole locations. As the title indicates, it all centers around a quadrupole in the Earth for the ECDO cataclysmic event.

He goes on to note the four pole positions during ECDO and which are dominant. The most dominant is the one that The Ethical Skeptic has well-documented, but Methuselah here may have found another around 5,000 years ago. What I like to call the “Noah Event”.

With each of these cataclysms, little – if any – human record survives. With the Noah Event, we have the Bible. We have the Epic of Gilgamesh. We have hundreds of flood myths from hundreds of cultures around the globe. The further back we go and the more of these cataclysmic cycles occur, the less we have beyond absolute legend as is the case with Atlantis or Lemuria.

Anyway, back to the topic at hand. Methuselah set up a visual aid to show the earth’s quadrupole and it is a great way to see what he describes in his article. The key data point that determined there might be multiple ECDO outcomes came from this paleomagnetic study and this subsequent chart:

Source: R. X. Zhu, R. S. Coe, X. X. Zhao, Journal of Geophysical Research

He goes on to explain the science behind it and its worth every second of your time, but I do TPW simulations so I will skip ahead to what I’d like to focus on from this new research.

First, he ended his article with the likely pole positions during the ECDO event:

  • (31 E, 14 S) – the most common one, preferred by LLSVP inclination
  • (58 W, 14 S) – less common, but likely the most recent 5ka event
  • (122 E, 14 S)- less common, ~same probability as 58 W
  • (148 W, 14 S) – least common, disfavored by LLSVP inclination

Our focus for the Noah Event comes down to the second less common probability and the likely location of the actual Noah Event we seek.

The Noah Event simulation

The reason this is important is because the Epic of Gilgamesh notes the inundation came from the south. However, when I ran normal ECDO simulations, Africa and the Middle East don’t get hammered too badly compared to other parts of the planet.

That is easily dismissed by any hardcore scientist or researcher as the Epic of Gilgamesh and the Bible just being myths or fanciful story-telling, not an actual record of a real event. Sure, the flood stories across the globe cannot be dismissed totally, but you can easily argue that they are not literal or there was a flood but hard to prove where it came from or how it arrived.

However, taking into account multiple ECDO outcomes, this Noah Event suddenly begins to look like a very real situation. Add this simulation to the text from the Epic of Gilgamesh directly:

The South Wind rushed in flooding over the mountains. Brother could not see brother in the welter; none of the gods in heaven could see the earth; the land was shattered like a shattered pot;

The Annunaki sat and wept with her, the cowering gods wept, covering their mouths. Six days and nights the storm went on this way, the South Wind flooding over the mountains and valleys until the seventh day when the storm birth labor subsided at last, the flood subsided at last.

Reading that and then comparing to what it might look like from above…

Look where the inundation first arrives into the fertile crescent. It slams into the region from the south and obliterates all of the cradles of civilization of the era. Where the inundation seems to reach its limit also happens to be around the location where many believe Noah’s Ark came to reside on the slopes of Mount Ararat in Turkey.

It’s good to see confluence. Much like the confluence I found within the full ECDO simulation this weekend showing Giza Plateau under just enough water during State 2 to have caused the damage to the peak of Khafre Pyramid.

To me, this is the best evidence yet of confirming the Noah Event and also advancing the research behind the ECDO theory in general.


About the author
HashingZap

Just a guy who is fascinated by catastrophism and the scientific challenges those researchers have put up against mainstream gradualist dogma.